Michael Arrington, founder of Tech Crunch, interviewed Mitt Romney recently. Tech Crunch is to technology what the Drudge Report is to politics.
Here are some choice excerpts:
MA: … The US technology industry, of course, has been a world leader. And a lot of the growth has been through international markets, particularly over the last ten to twenty years. What would you do as president to advance these efforts?
MR: Well, first it’s important to communicate as you do to your audience that the trade and opening markets to American goods is essential. The only way America is going to remain the world’s superpower is if we can compete globally, so I want to open more markets to our goods and I will negotiate with other nations to do so. At the same time I want to make sure that our trading with other nations is done on a fair basis, and when a nation like China does not honor our intellectual property rights then we’re going to have to get serious with our Chinese friends and say guys you just can’t do that or you’re going to suffer consequences in our markets. So we’re going to have to fight to make sure that our products are protected and our technology is protected but also to not close down foreign markets, open them up, we can compete around the world.
This is one of the things that attracted me to Mitt Romney, he knows technology and he knows politics and he knows where the two meet. Next, onto Internet taxes:
MA: Ok, great. Let’s jump into internet taxes, some news today on that actually. The 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act bars federal state and local governments from taxing internet access or imposing discriminatory internet only taxes. Things like bit taxes, bandwidth taxes, email taxes. It doesn’t of course prohibit states from collecting sales taxes on things like e-commerce. It was twice extended by Congress and actually was set to expire this Thursday, but last week the Senate voted to extend the ban and then this morning the house voted 402-0 to approve the bill as well for a 7 year extension. I’d just like to get your position on internet only taxes.
MR: I think the indication of the house vote indicates that most American’s are of the point of view that Internet only taxes of the type you describe are not something we want to see. I have a specific position on that issue, but I do not want to see internet only taxes as you described them or access fees or email charges and so forth. We do enough taxing in this country and let’s not add more taxes. I’d rather see the tax for innovation reduced rather than expanded.
Lastly, the real tech question that matters. Promise to our readers here: I will make Mitt a Mac convert yet!
MA: I guess that brings us to the most important question I have to ask you, which is…Governor Romney, Mac or PC?
MR: I have a PC. My sons have a Mac and swear by it, but I have a couple PC’s.
MA: So one of your sons is on Mac, or most of them are?
MR: 3 out of the 5 boys I believe are on Macs, and they swear by them, but I’m a creature of habit, I’ve got my PC.
MA: I’ve got to say I’m slightly disappointed and that’s going to hurt you in Silicon Valley (laughs), but at least it will help you in Texas where Dell is. Do you have an iPod?
MR: I do.
MA: Of course you have an IPod! What’s on it? What are you listening to right now, what sort of albums have you downloaded or listened to?
MR: What I typically download is country music as well as 1960’s music. I’m a baby boomer, so the Beatles and the Stones and some of the old groups from the 1960’s are my favorites, I listen to them and I listen to country. I might have some inspirational music as well, but those are the highlights for me.
November 1st, 2007 at 1:08 pm
I was hoping Arrington would ask him whether it would be easier to install an online content filter of Macs or PCs.
November 1st, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Yes! A presidential candidate that deep down understands Macs are like riding the bus, but has the grace to soften the blow to the fragile Macophile ego.
November 1st, 2007 at 1:29 pm
I guess I just don’t get it. If Romney knows technology and business, why not flaunt it when talking to a tech junkie? For instance, I would have talked about the new Apple o/s or maybe the iphone and talked about how this digital revolution is just starting. Or maybe about how technology can aid our teachers. He says absolutely nothing.
November 1st, 2007 at 1:36 pm
Finding out that Mitt likes the Stones is extremely disturbing to me.
November 1st, 2007 at 3:13 pm
PabloZed (#3), can you do the flaunting in “minutes”, which is how long this interview was? Perhaps Mitt knew that, and answered only enough so that Michael could ask more questions?
November 1st, 2007 at 3:43 pm
That was a fun interview. So rumor has it Google is going to try for the airwaves the TV folks are abandoning and give us all free phone and internet access. The TV industry lobbyists are fighting it hard in DC. I was holding off on the IPod because I want email capacity, but this beats all….
November 1st, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Pablo, if you read the whole interview, he answered business related questions quite well. For whatever reason, the interviewer choose not to go into the real tech heavy stuff (net neutrality, etc).
November 1st, 2007 at 8:22 pm
I switched to Mac 3 years ago and I will never switch back. Is there anybody who likes using Windows?
November 3rd, 2007 at 11:56 am
PhGrata is right. Arrington missed the boat on asking about net neutrality, a question that is of real importance to his readership that less tech-focused writers probably won’t cover either. Lame.