December 26, 2007

Race 4 2008 Early Morning Essential Reads

Rudy Giuliani

Mike Huckabee

Mitt Romney

John McCain

Fred Thompson

General Race 4 2008 News

Hillary Clinton

Barack Obama

by @ 4:22 am. Filed under R4'08 Essential Reads
Trackback URL for this post:
http://race42008.com/2007/12/26/race-4-2008-early-morning-essential-reads-79/trackback/

20 Responses to “Race 4 2008 Early Morning Essential Reads”

  1. Axel G. (independent) Says:

    Aron,

    Are you a jew?

  2. www.act-blog.co.nr Says:

    On the Romney thing, I haven’t read the story, but the summary is complete crap. Firstly, Romney has not experienced any kind of significant drop. Secondly, McCain is deffinately not more Conservative than Romney. If the papers were looking to endorse a Conservative, they would pick Thompson. Instead, they want a moderate Republican, like McCain.

    The idea that McCain is more Conservative than Romney is absurd.

  3. Colin Jones Says:

    Interesting, from an anti-Rudy paper:
    Despite polls, Rudy Giuliani’s not done

  4. K Dub Says:

    Well act-blog, I for one think McCain is more conservative than Romney. But then I value things like consistency, principles, and honesty. Mitt now says a lot of things that sound conservative. (Except in 2002, he called himself a progressive, moderate Republican). Talk, though, is quite cheap. Especially when one needs to parse Mitt’s words to decide if he is just speaking “figuratively”…

    BTW, Romney has fallen behind McCain on the NH InTrades! This is huge; I expect the polls to follow shortly. Discuss…

  5. www.act-blog.co.nr Says:

    You can’t argue that John McCain is more Conservative while saying that we should look at records more than rhetoric. Romney governed as a Conservative, even if he did say things to get liberals in MA to vote for him.

    McCain, on the other hand, has a liberal record on several important issues. He supported Amnesty, he attacked free speech with his CfR bill, he opposed the Bush tax cuts, and used liberal talking points to justify his opposition, he wants to tie the hands of American interrogators, and he opposed the federal marraige amendment.

    If John McCain wins the nomination, the GOP is in trouble.

    As for intrade, that is why it is so unreliable as an actual indicator of who is going to win. People see one poll, and they decide to cash out. Not becasue they think Romney will lose, but becasue they don’t want to risk their money. In reality, Romney still leads the GOP race in New Hampshire, and John McCain only went up in the polls after a string of endorsements. He lacks the money to capitalize on those endorsements, and, with his name out of the headlines, I think his support will start to drop again.

  6. sampo Says:

    There Mitt goes again! Losing the reddest of red states the country has to offer! What self-respecting Republican thinks he can enter the race and lose North Carolina? (certainly not one I care to support)

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/north_carolina/north_carolina_2008_presidential_election

  7. Colin Jones Says:

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/103462/Hillary-Edges-Oprah-Most-Admired-Woman-07.aspx#2

  8. www.act-blog.co.nr Says:

    What you don’t mention Sampo is that Giuliani is only +1, and that Romney is wintin a margin of error. Considering the fact that Giuliani is well known, and that Romney is not, you basically have to flip a coin to find out who is in a better position.

  9. John Galt Says:

    new arg poll out. confirms dead heat between huck and romney. huckabust is coming to quote abe.

  10. sampo Says:

    guiliani’s electability is poor too. But at least he’s competitive in other states. like NJ.

    did anyone get a chance to read the Union Leader’s anti-Mitt endorsement? Brutal!

  11. econ grad stud Says:

    Sampo the state polls have almost no use this early.

    The main advantage Romney would have in the general is his ability to self-fund his campaign. What troubles me about Romney is that almost half the voters say they’ll never vote for him. That’s an awful high hill to climb even with all of his money. I assume he’d craft a message to woo independents but I wonder how far he could go with that given his shaky record.

  12. sampo Says:

    john gault,
    where’s the new ARG poll?

  13. econ grad stud Says:

    It’s not a new poll. I saw it several days ago.

  14. www.act-blog.co.nr Says:

    Anyway, If the GOP chooses McCain, it will be doing three things:

    1) Choosing a man who’s record on most important issues is moderate at best and liberal at worst. GOP is the deffinition of a RINO.

    2) Choosing a man who’s ability to serve as a long term leader of the GOP (and more importantly, the Conservative movement) is severely restricted.

    3) Showing a willingness to retreat back to the one issue the GOP already has in the bag, rather than choosing a leader who can lead on Conservative positiosn on other major issues.

  15. www.act-blog.co.nr Says:

    “did anyone get a chance to read the Union Leader’s anti-Mitt endorsement? Brutal!”

    I did, and if just shows the paper to be another pro-McCain hack.

  16. sampo Says:

    13, ya i thought so too. just goes to show some mitt bots have trouble paying attention.

  17. sampo Says:

    paper to be another pro-McCain hack.

    Actually the Union Leader is the paper of record in the state. AND it is conservative.

    Did you like the part where they said Mitt Romney doesn’t have the endorsement of a SINGLE paper in NH? A SINGLE one! How many NH papers have endorsed McCain by now? I’ve lost count. 4?

    Let those sour grapes shine thru ACT Blog…

  18. Jeff Fuller Says:

    Aron’s editorializing via selection bias in his article choices. 4 pro-Rudy articles when all the press on him has been that he’s slipping/failing?

    Highlighting an anti-Mitt piece as if there has been no other news on him in the last 48 hours?

  19. sampo Says:

    Take a chill Jeff. How do you NOT link to the Union Leader’s anti Romney article? How is that NOT relevant? It has been posted ALL over the blogs this morning.

    I guess if even the mittbots cannot spin something as “good news” they attack the integrity of who ever opposes Mitt Romney’s run.

  20. Jeff Fuller Says:

    OK . . . Aron’s added some more since my comment.

    I didn’t have a problem with that story being listed . . . but being listed as the only Mitt story in 48 hours when Rudy got 4 positive pieces just seemed a bit over the top.

The Candidates





























Featured Archives


Race 4 2008 Interviews

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Search

Blogroll

Facebook


Join Race 4 2008 on Facebook

Site Syndication

Twitter

Main

Meta Data

Design and Hosting By