His post primary exile is over. Fred’s new column over at Townhall:
Spending some time on the campaign trail has confirmed a couple of thoughts I’ve had before I entered the Republican primary race.
First, conservatism is alive and well in America; don’t let anyone tell you differently. And by conservatism, I don’t mean the warmed-over “raise your hand if you believe …” kind of conservatism we see blooming every election cycle. No, I’m speaking of the conservatism grounded in principles based upon enduring truths: an understanding of the importance of human nature in the affairs of individuals and nations. Respect for the lessons of history, the importance of faith and tradition. The understanding that while man is prone to err, he is capable of great things when not subjugated by a too-powerful government. These are the principles that inspired our Founding Fathers, and resulted in a Constitution that delineated the powers of the central government, established checks and balances among the branches of government and further diffused governmental power by a system of Federalism.
Second, change – whether it “real change,” “bold change” or the “change we can believe in” variety others are selling – isn’t itself an innovative policy or a particularly strong leadership stance. In fact, from Burke to Buckley, there has been an acknowledgement that change in the political arena is inevitable and necessary, and we in the U.S. tend to experience it in regular, 2, 4 and 6 year intervals, so 2008 is hardly our first rodeo. The challenge for conservatives is calibrating whether the change being proposed is consistent with our principles and our philosophy, and whether that change is appropriate.
Our nation has some serious issues to work through for today … and for the next generation. Now isn’t the time for conservatives to be looking for a tailored message or a politically expedient route to victory if the end result is going to be the inevitable slide toward the liberalization and secularization of America, and the growth of government and loss of freedom that inevitably ensues. For us conservatives it must be about principles and policies that are grounded in freedom, free markets and the rule of law. That’s what I’ve been talking and writing about for the past few years, and that’s what I want to talk write about here on Townhall and in the new Townhall Magazine.
I joined Townhall and am writing exclusive commentaries for Townhall Magazine because I see them elevating the discourse on issues based on these principles — smaller government, individual liberty, standing for common values that have become all too uncommon, a strong national defense and, most of all, an optimism and belief in America.
I’m glad to be back here in familiar territory, and we’ll be talking to you soon.
May 19th, 2008 at 9:29 am
He says the right words now… or writes them (listening to Fred is like listening to GWB, which I avoid)… but I simply do not trust unrepentant former abortion lobbyists.
May 19th, 2008 at 9:41 am
If Fred Thompson wasn’t so doggone lazy, he would make a good Veep. I think he’d do great in a debate with whoever the Veep for the Democrats is. McCain won’t pick him because of the laziness factor though.
May 19th, 2008 at 10:08 am
Here’s Fred’s newest column…
California, here we come…
http://www.townhall.com/blog/g/1f83686c-5dc3-41b5-bd22-34922a4c5a25
May 19th, 2008 at 10:12 am
Fred should take up punditry. He’d have fun, he’d only have to do ten-minute segments on television, and he’d get to write on his computer while wearing his underwear.
Perfect job for him!
May 19th, 2008 at 10:54 am
Aron,
Thanks.
Clarence,
Aside from my own personal bias that favors Fred, I’m not going to push for Thompson on the ticket. Maybe in my dreamworld, but it’s not going to happen, and it doesn’t make a lot of sense to match up to old guys.
May 19th, 2008 at 11:01 am
I too like what he has written, but I hope he avoids the slide into simplistic partisan attacks. People are genuinely interested in policy.
Tommy,
What is the deal with your state party going after Mrs. Obama? I think attacking a woman is never a good idea.